Wizard of Oz: pay no attention to man behind curtain
Yes, the Arab Spring that flowed into Europe as the Indignados finally washed up on the shores of America on September 17th. Occupy Wall Street seems to have signaled to the rest of the world that even Americans can see we're heading in the wrong direction, galvanizing the globe into action as the occupy movement went viral on October 15th. Simultaneous protests in 951 cities in 82 countries don't happen every day you know, especially for something as amorphous as this, where there is no leader nor concrete demands. Instead, it's a general feeling that we're no longer in control; ballot boxes are meaningless when the wizard dictates our range of choices while free markets have become the wizard's money laundering service thanks to corporate lobbying for deregulation and government handouts. It's impossible to pin down what the protesters want which drives those who don't understand batty. Lol'd into passive acceptance by cute cats and TV talking heads whose job it is to propogate the very social, political and economic infrastructure the movement wants to tear down. The strength of the occupy movement is simply it's presence, Toto pulling back the curtain on a system of the 1%, by the 1% and for the 1%. We understand that Wall Street is but one player (albeit an important one) in a global system in which finance, state, and entities like the World Bank, the IMF, and multinationals worldwide work for the benefit of an elite few, all at the cost of the rest of us, perpetuating a global system of slavery, war, and inequality.
"There are no conditions of life to which a man cannot get accustomed, especially if he sees them accepted by everyone around him." Tolstoy - 1877
Here we are three years into the financial crisis, great recession, lesser depression or whatever you want to call it and we're still no closer to getting out of it. In fact, if we listen to those unelected officials the system has empowered to guide us to safety, things are in fact looking positively apocalyptic. US Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner warns of "cascading defaults", "bank runs" and "catastrophic risk". The International Monetary Fund says "the global economy is in a dangerous new phase" while World Bank President Robert Zoellick warns that Europe, Japan, and the U.S. are in such danger, they’re threatening to "drag down not only themselves, but the global economy." Those elected are no more reassuring; Obama deflects the US failure to accomplish anything by telling Europe they are "scaring the world" so the G20 finance ministers meet again and again to point fingers while Merkozy huddle together to formulate another plan to further enslave the Greeks and the Polish finance minister warns of war if we allow the EU to break up. This all sounds eerily familiar, doesn't it? Preparing us for the next crisis moment when we'll have to do everything in our power to save the world economy; it's just like October 2008 all over again.
"There is no alternative" - Margaret Thatcher
In fact we're in a worse place today because we're still chasing the delusion of perpetual GDP growth and using debt as a propellant. A five thousand year old habit driving a much newer idea; even the Babylonians had debt but it took an American, Simon Kuznets in 1937, to come up with a catch-all number to measure a nation's production. It has become the measuring stick by which we gauge our success and just as importantly, is used in the calculation of how much debt we can service. Thanks to the charity shown to the banks, the level of aggregate net government debt in the world rose from $23 trillion in 2007 to $34 trillion in 2010 and IMF forecasts indicate the level will reach $48 trillion in 2015. The ratio of world debt to world GDP rose from 44 percent in 2007 to 59 percent in 2010, and is expected to climb to 65 percent in 2015. Oh, and the total of outstanding ‘bets’ in the leveraged, optioned, securitized derivatized casino in all likelihood exceeds a quadrillion (yeah, $1,000,000,000,000,000)
"The shock doctrine is the use of fear to push the public into allowing policies that they would not normally accept." Naomi Klein; The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism
Bailout beneficiary Bank of America can transfer $75 trillion from their derivative division at Merrill Lynch to deposits so they are backstopped by the American taxpayer through the FDIC, start charging customers $5/month to use their own money, layoff 40000 employees and give a $6 million and a $5 million payout to a couple of departing executives all in the same month. Oh, don't try to close your account there or Citibank, otherwise you're bound to get arrested. Executive pay at the 200 biggest US companies last year went up by an average 23% over 2009, the median executive salary was $10.8 million. Even after being saved by the taxpayers, of the 100 highest-paid chief executives in the United States in 2010, 25 took home more pay than their company paid in federal corporate income taxes. Coincidentally, the collective net worth of members of Congress rose 25% in the past two years, an increase of more than $2 billion. Directors' pay at the largest UK companies was up an average of 50% in 2010. Meanwhile, the average American family's household net worth declined 23% between 2007 and 2009.
You don't need to understand the processes of cognitive dissonance, epistemic closure, conformation or anchoring bias to know why so many accept and even defend a broken system. Upton Sinclair put it best, "It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it!". Most of us are lucky if we have time to read the morning headlines before rushing off to work, we've got mortgages, car loans, student loans, home entertainment system loans and credit cards to pay off don't you know? While those shiny gizmos bought from Wal-Mart on Chinese credit along with all real wealth, from buildings to oil and pigs, are subject to the inescapable entropy law of thermodynamics and will rot, rust, or wear out with age, money and debt, as accounting devices invented by humans, are subject only to the laws of mathematics. Like a latter-day priesthood, with abstruse equations in place of latin texts, the bankers and economists dominate the discourse, convincing us that it's all too complicated when in fact "the process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled." We have sat powerlessly and watched all the king's horses and all the king's men try to put the Humpty-Dumpty banking cartel together again through a series of bailouts, zero-interest loans, and mergers and acquisitions which have done nothing but make the original problem worse.
"Thus did a handful of rapacious citizens come to control all that was worth controlling in America. Thus was the savage and stupid and entirely inappropriate and unnecessary and humorless American class system created. Honest, industrious, peaceful citizens were classed as bloodsuckers, if they asked to be paid a living wage. And they saw that praise was reserved henceforth for those who devised means of getting paid enormously for committing crimes against which no laws had been passed. Thus the American dream turned belly up, turned green, bobbed to the scummy surface of cupidity unlimited, filled with gas, went bang in the noonday sun." - Kurt Vonnegut, God Bless You, Mr. Rosewater
Ah, the original problem. Take a look in the mirror. Yep, you're probably looking at it. This world wasn't created overnight and it won't be fixed by writing a letter to the editor or to your government representative. We allowed ourselves to be sold an impossible dream, we made a deal with the devil in which we sold our souls for an IOU. We gave up our homes, pensions, education, unions and freedom in exchange for the easy life where housing prices always went up, we didn't have to do any dirty work, our kids would go to the best schools and we could all retire at 55 while the wizards of Wall Street made it all happen. We could maintain an affluent, equitable society without any maintenance of the infrastructure through the magic of technology driven efficiency. These wizards not only had our ear but they whispered sweet nothings into our leaders' ears as well and together we allowed them to take control. Thus neoliberalism came to rule the world in a whirlwind of privatization, deregulation, free trade and tax cuts for everyone. Technology, efficiency and most importantly, finance, would take care of everything while assuming that rule of law, infrastructure and basic decency just happen. A few among us saw the warning signs, their cautionary tales simply became how-to-manuals on how to succeed as Gordon Gecko was transformed into the ideal and we somehow imagined we could all be Paris Hilton.
"When people stop believing in God, they don't believe in nothing - they believe in anything." - G.K. Chesterton
We've killed all our gods but one and now it's killing us. Over the past couple hundred years we've transformed the once quirky humanities subject of political economy into the science of economics, and not just a normative one but positive, a science that describes things as they are, not simply the way we want them to be. Heck, we even pretend it has its own Nobel Prize which was never Alfred's intention. Just as traditional religions often find the most vulnerable among us the most susceptible to conversion, western society was a ripe target for proselytization forty years ago. We had seemingly hit the limits of growth as ecological catastrophe loomed alongside the stagflation created by the oil crisis, while Watergate, Vietnam and the failure of price controls had shaken our faith in government. This opened the door for a new faith, where economic growth would come from unleashing the power of the market by relying on individual greed. Milton Friedman became more powerful than elected officials thanks to his prophecies while his disciples took over the levers of the world's economies, going so far as overthrowing sovereign nations, and created a neoliberal world order.
"An economist is an expert who will know tomorrow why the things he predicted yesterday didn't happen today." - Laurence J. Peter
"An economist is someone who sees something working in practice and asks whether it would work in principle." - Stephen M. Goldfeld
How can a model predict anything when the variables don't have any sense and have changed beyond recognition over time. The Kennedy administration wanted to lower unemployment so they invented the term 'discouraged worker' which disappeared millions of job seekers. Johnson created the 'unified budget', which rolls surplus Social Security funds into the general budget, where they are spent but then not reported as part of the deficit. Nixon stipped out food and fuel to give us the "core inflation" measure we normally use today which is like reporting inflation ex-inflation. In 1996, Clinton further mangled the meaning by giving us substitution, weighting, and hedonics, where the basket of goods measured from year to year changes as it is now assumed that when the price of something rises, people will switch to something cheaper (hot dogs for salmon), goods and services that are rising most rapidly in price get a lower weighting under the assumption that people will use less of those things and adjusts for quality improvements, especially those that lead to greater enjoyment or utility of the product (iPad2 over iPad1). GDP figures meanwhile are just as meaningless as they include trillions in imputations, which assume economic value had been created but no actual transactions took place. Examples include the 'value' that the owner of a house receives by not having to pay themselves rent or the benefits from receiving free checking accounts. Oh, yeah, the magic of hedonics boosts the GDP too. Even if we had perfectly reliable numbers to plug into economic models, we'd still get the wrong results thanks to the wonders of model calibration in which the dismal science simply reinvents the wheel each time the cart crashes. Is it any wonder that nearly every economist was blindsided by the financial crisis?
On the first day God created the sun - so the Devil countered and created sunburn. On the second day God created sex - in response the Devil created marriage. On the third day God created an economist. This was a tough one for the Devil, but in the end and after a lot of thought he created a second economist!
Instead of altering their views to fit the facts, economists simply alter the facts to fit their views. Thus, we get jokes played on us such as the Laffer Curve which theorized government revenue goes up when taxes are decreased and rationalized tax cuts. The laugh is on the poor who are looking for the wealth that was supposed to trickle down while the rich keep laughing all the way to the bank. Neoliberal driven deregulation has led to free trade agreements under the guise of comparative advantage that simply allow production to be shifted to slave labor countries and the CEO to award themselves for their ingenuity. To add insult to injury, the modern day gurus tasked with manipulating these numbers to argue for government policy are inevitably recruited from the largest financial institutions and return to the private banking world through a revolving door. So, not only are we relying on the equivalent of the alchemist to make gold out of copper and engineer economic stimulus or the astrologer to chart the skies and predict the future, these charlatans have every incentive to create policies that benefit the JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs of the world.
 |
| Continent color-coded correlation by country b/w GINI & life expectancy |
Turning colleges and universities into profit seeking corporations has not only turned them into machines to generate revenues for faculty, research scientists, theorists and facilities but has also turned education into a simple monetary investment with no guarantees. When this is seen alongside the closed intellectual circle formed between universities, business and government (hello Larry Summers!) it's no wonder the system is only capable of producing drones who don't have the ability to think critically. Conformity is valued over ingenuity driving the best and brightest to study finance and economics in hopes of going to Wall Street to move numbers around and make money. instead of philosophy or science. This brain drain will continue, leaving us with no alternative unless society learns to value education as an essential ingredient toward a more complete populace instead of a mechanism for enrichment for the few at the expense of the many.
While students in Europe don't need to enslave themselves to get a higher education as it is considered the human right that it is (with the glaring exception of the UK), their countries' sovereign debt, particularly the PIIGS, has subjugated the entire continent. Each crisis in confidence leads to renewed market attacks resulting in constant emergency meetings which issue renewed demands for national austerity in order to qualify for ever growing debt-packages to pile onto the existing debt. We're warned the interconnectedness of the world's financial markets means that the failure of one node in the global debt payment merry-go-round could cause a replay of the Lehman Brothers collapse in 2008. Yet, ultimately, countries such as Greece will have to jump off as the very austerity demanded in exchange for new debt makes it increasingly difficult to pay as economic growth is retarded. If you take the macro view of debt and investment, it can only be a stable (sustainable) scenario when it is actually being used to build systems that will produce more tangible wealth: That way debt is multiplied and repaid, with interest. Taking Greece again as the example, one can see most of the new debt is simply going to old debt.
Logic, ever bit as much as the protests from Stygmata Square to Wall Street, has shifted the conversation over the past couple of years from the impossibility toward the inevitability of default. Don't be fooled though, we'll keep waking up to "I Got You Babe" just like Bill Murray in Groundhog Day, but it'll be sung by the duo of Merkozy with the Chinese singing backup instead of Sonny and Cher and every morning will be a little worse than the previous. The latest deal to save Greece and the eurozone through a combination of begging the weaker banks to raise $100 billion in capital, borrowing a trillion from wherever they can find it and bribing the private bondholders to take a 50% haircut is too little too late no matter how much they sing the praises of fixing a debt problem with more debt now that Greece has been scalped. In this bizarro world, omniscient markets soar and bond spreads narrow on news that a credit event, which would have required the payout on billions of euros in credit default swaps, has been avoided as the imposition on the debt holders is called voluntary and it's normal watching Sarkozy beg the Chinese to become Europe's master.
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. - Mahatma Gandhi (purportedly)
A big question is what took so long? We forget that popular protests took a few years to develop even after the Great Depression and there's always the 400% increase in the use of anti-depressants over the past two decades. There's also the memory of how the US government responded then or just a few years ago to protests they don't like. Besides, after the first round of financial terrorism in 2008, the elite astroturfed a Faux News promoted faux-populist movement to channel the rage away from the corporate culprits onto their lackies, the US government. Compared with the Tea Party media coverage, Occupy Wall Street was ignored early on, it took a bit of police brutality to whet the appetite of the public. Once it became clear the protesters weren't going away, the politicians and the press followed the playbook by mocking, attacking and demeaning those involved. Eric Cantor, the House majority leader, denounced "mobs" and "the pitting of Americans against Americans". The GOP presidential candidates weighed in, with Mitt Romney accusing the protesters of waging "dangerous, class warfare" while Herman Cain called them "anti-American". Senator Rand Paul did his best to one-up the wingnuts by worrying aloud that the protesters will start seizing iPads, because the protesters believe rich people don’t deserve to have them. If you were listening to the talking heads on CNBC, you learned that the protesters "let their freak flags fly" and are "aligned with Lenin". On Faux News, Sean Hannity told one occupier she didn't "believe in freedom" while Ann Coulter called the Wall Street occupation "The beginning of totalitarianism." If you're unlucky enough to be exposed to the corporate propaganda of CNN, you might have caught former bankster, current bankster fiancee and all-around evil tool of the banking cartel Erin Burnett's expose revealing...well, her vapidness. Seriously? The US made $20 billion on the TARP bailout? Um, no, more like lost around $100 billion. Oh, and I guess she just forgot about the $1.5 trillion still owed for those Fed loans.
If the occupy protests in the US were to be broken up today (under a hail of rubber bullets, tear gas and flash bangs like in Oakland) they could already claim victory. Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke said he "can't blame" protesters for being angry. Republican leader of the House, John "I pass tobacco kickbacks out on the congressional floor" Boehner has said that he understands the "frustrations" driving the Occupy Wall Street movement. Dick Cheney, possibly the single best exemplar of why such protests are so necessary has said when he looks at Wall Street, he sees "a group of people that I fundamentally disagree with on a lot of things" - particularly "where they wield political influence." Later in the same interview though he cautioned against claims that his former company Halliburton wields too much influence, "We’ve got to be careful, I’m always a little bit leery of conspiracy theories". Of course it was Cheney's influence wielding that brought riches to his former company Halliburton through first war in Iraq and then inserting the Halliburton loophole into the 2005 Energy Act to exempt his and other gas companies from environmental regulation to allow the practice of hydraulic fracturing to wreak havoc on lives and the environment.
Perversely, our system of representative democracy and free markets has created the authoritarian oligarchy we live in as the idea of representation is used to legitimize the vast decision-making powers of the ruling elite. It took humanity over 10,000 years to give democracy a shot and now that we're a few hundred years into the experiment many think the present system is programmed into our DNA. However, democracy clearly isn't viable in the context of extreme instability and social inequality, in which 1% of the population owns and polices the other 99%. A central tenant of the Occupy/Indignado movement is a call to end the corrupt occupations of western democracies by a system of corporate lobbying and campaign financing along with the takeover of decision making by unelected bureaucrats. We're still in the early dawn of the Citizens United decision to allow unlimited corporate political spending but the need for revolution rather than just evolution is already obvious, the evidence that spending money lobbying Congress means higher corporate profits is mainstream knowledge. Bailouts, lobbyists, campaign donations and a revolving door between corporate boardrooms and positions in government are just a few of the signs.
Robert Rubin moves from Goldman Sachs to Treasury Secretary where he led the charge for financial deregulation that culminated in the repeal of Glass-Steagall which broke the barriers between banking, investment and insurance setting the stage for the financial crisis. Oh yeah, then he raked in $128 million as a payoff from Citigroup, a company who owes its existence to the laws he shaped. Legislation intended to rein in Wall Street such as the Frank-Dodd bill has no chance of having any teeth when bank lobbyists spend hundreds of millions to ensure it doesn't. Citizens United has codified the fact that money does talk ensuring corporate persons have the only voices that count in getting people elected. Legality is determined by justices with conflicts of interest, presidents are elected if Wall Street says so and congressmen only hear their corporate benefactors. When people are given the chance to have their say, it is ignored when unelected elites deem their words to be meaningless until we say what they want us to. Unelected bureaucrats in Brussels and Frankfurt not only dictate austerity for all but force constitutions to be amended, labour laws to be relaxed and pensions to be slashed.
In the pay to play world of politics, legislators should dress like Nascar drivers wearing the logos of the corporations they take their orders from, mostly Big Oil, Big Pharma and Big Bank. The top lobbying firms and super PACs determine who gets elected and then the policies they pass. The media reflects this by reporting on the never-ending election cycle like a horse race determined more by money than policy. It's simply a self-fulfilling prophecy that corporate profits reach new record levels quarter after quarter, industry after industry as US Bank announces record profit while about 10 million mortgages are estimated to be underwater (the house is worth less than the loan) and home prices continue to fall. Unemployment will never come down as long as free trade agreements are crafted to serve the interests of multinational corporations instead of the people. Of course Dave Hartnett, the permanent secretary for tax at HM Revenue & Customs in the UK is the most wined and dined public servant in the land, he ensures Vodafone and the banks don't have to pay their fair share of taxes. How else would we explain the shrinking share of corporate taxation in overall tax revenue at a time of record deficits caused by the very same firms paying for all the wine. Over the past 5 years, while GE made $26 billion in profits in the US, it received a $4.1 billion refund from the IRS; $19 million was paid to Chevron for making $10 billion in profits in 2009 while Exxon made $19 billion the same year and received a cheque for $156 million from Uncle Sam. In response to the We Are the 99% Tumblr, rightwing nuts created the We Are the 53% (sorry for not linking to a hate site) to spread the false meme that 47% of Americans don't pay taxes while the fact is the poor pay a bigger share of their income in other taxes, particularly the highly regressive payroll tax, than the rich. Over 1,400 millionaires paid no income taxes in 2009 while Warren Buffett wants to be taxed more as he pays less than his secretary and hedge fund managers who made $1 billion last year now pay a lower effective tax rate than many nurses
Meanwhile this corrupt economic machine has also created an insatiable military industrial complex that necessitates the creation of enemies, real and imagined. Even rightwing nuts become "weaponized Keynesians" believing in government's ability to create jobs as long as it means building bombs instead of bridges. The voice of the 99% was ignored on February 15, 2003 when upward of 15 million people in sixty countries marched together to try to stop Dubya from finishing his dad's work in Iraq. Maybe by creating occupied territories at home we can force the spotlight onto the other Occupied Territories, helped by the authorities who use the very firepower deployed by the IDF on Palestinians in American cities such as Oakland and somehow reveal the hypocrisy of our leaders' efforts to negotiate a settlement which simply allows Israel to build illegal settlements. The 1% reap the rewards while the ranks of the 99% provide the fodder for the machine; the rich don't fight in the wars they create, just profit from them. Prime Minister's cut their teeth playing lapdog to superpowers by marching their country off to war before earning their payday playing the part for JPMorgan with foreign dictators who we help murder after their usefulness has worn off. The cost of funding the Pentagon and operations in Iraq every year is more than the rest of the world spends on defense and almost double what the US spends on education, health, housing and transport combined.
That's why despite the celebration of the assassination of Osama bin Laden, an enemy Reagan created, the perpetual war on terror isn't any closer to ending. Much of the west is still in an unwinnable war in Afghanistan that has slipped into it's second decade. Iraq festers. The Cameron/Sarkhozy war against Berlusconi, er, I mean the nine months of NATO bombing the hell out of Libya, oops, I mean limited kinetic operation protecting the people of Bengazi from the regime we chose to change by murdering, yikes, I mean helped hunt down so a future terrorist, whoops, freedom fighter could kill him in cold blood, in Libya is just a stepping stone to AFRICOM. All a necessary part of the package, exploded bombs and missiles need to be replaced, on credit preferably. Anyone else notice how quick the TNG got a central bank up in running in the previously debt free country of Libya? Let's not even talk about how troops landing in Uganda is just a geopolitical chest thumping for the Chinese who are busy buying up and building the continent. Won't it be fun when the US and China are forced into the inevitable confrontation, probably over Taiwan or maybe debt collection when the debt jubilee is finally declared.
An indebted country has a moral obligation to default on that loan if paying it would mean starving its people. Extreme austerity is a trap. Defaulting is not that big of a deal. They did it in the 1980's with the Brady bonds. They did it in Brazil, in Argentina. Those countries got re-established, and here we are 20 years later. It's not the end of the world. Banks have been going out of business for centuries. Look at the United States, the British were constantly loaning money for railroad construction, canal construction, there were booms and busts. They lost money. And they'd come back two years later and do it all over again. So the idea that because some big banks go under its the end of the world is not just morally wrong, it's historically wrong. It's not how banking and economic history has worked. Some economists study inequality and what drives it. Others study financial fragility and macroeconomic volatility. But the two subjects are seldom addressed as underlying cause and effect. Gross concentrations of money at the top help explain why the system eventually stalls out. This is a basic insight that ought to inform the agenda for recovery.
Hopefully you're asking yourself how I could propose a recovery and return to perpetual economic growth in the west when it's clearly impossible, after all, nothing grows forever. It's become obvious to all but the blind that infinite growth on a finite planet is ecological suicide. We seem to be on the horns of a seemingly intractable dilemma - without growth, we spiral into poverty; with it, we deplete the planet. Either way, we lose. But who's to say we can't have prosperity without growth? To stave off unemployment, we shorten the workweek to roughly four days, creating more jobs, we also set up higher taxes on the rich and more public services for the poor, and impose a carbon tax to fill government coffers and discourage the use of fossil fuels y voila! John Stuart Mill argued that growth was necessary only up to the point where everyone enjoyed a reasonable standard of living; likewise in 1930, John Maynard Keynes predicted that possibly as soon as his grandchildren's time the economy wouldn't need to grow (pdf) further to meet our basic needs; even Adam Smith acknowledged that it might be possible for an economy to max out its natural resources and stop growing. Yet since the conclusions of the Club of Rome in the 1960s that the world would eventually reach The Limits to Growth was attacked and delegitimized by the powers that be, not much attention has been paid to zero-growth economics.
Yet here we've been offered the perfect opportunity to wake up to the fact that we've probably already hit the limit, after all, today's measurement of health, GDP, measures all economic activity, including everything from oil spills to car accidents, both of which hugely boost economic activity. Worse, we have no way of measuring the negative impact we are having on future generations, such as the production of greenhouse gasses. All told, we are most likely already experiencing real negative growth. Besides, shouldn't the aim be to happiness? Yet despite GDP doubling in the US since 1957, the proportion of people who say they are very happy has barely budged. It seems happiness suffers from diminishing and then zero returns after about $75,000 (non-PDF). The Kingdom of Bhutan has already made the switch to GNH, Gross National Happiness as the yardstick by which the nation's success is judged. The upsurge of recent interest has given us Peter Victor's 2008 Managing Without Growth, and last December's Prosperity Without Growth (pdf) by Tim Jackson, economics commissioner for the UK's Sustainable Development Commission that have both good and bad news. People will benefit as efficiencies will bring about an explosion in free time allowing us to reconnect with our friends and families and most importantly nature, which itself will benefit from the lowering of consumerism. Sadly, however, you won't be able to buy a new iPhone every six-months and the zombie walk at the mall will become a bed-time story about the olden-days.
"Let’s treat this beautiful movement [Occupy] as if it is most important thing in the world. Because it is. It really is." - Naomi Klein
As the world welcomes it's seven billionth human it's high time we stop being trapped by what is, we've got to push for what ought to be. The underlying principle is that the powerful will do whatever they have to do to protect their interests. If you do not threaten those interests, you are free to do as you wish. If what you do somehow threatens that power, then the powerful will beat, arrest, or kill you. A piece of paper is not going to stop that even if it says constitution or bill of rights at the top as many occupy protesters from New York to Denver and Oakland have found out. Just as waking from a deep slumber can shock the system and seem disturbing, the process of realizing that when you live in a country that only allows you to exercise your rights in free speech zones you don't have real freedom. That's why this movement demands more than change along the edges. Obama's proposal to lower the maximum number of years and percentage of income to pay student loans from 30 to 25 years and 15 to 10%, the 50% haircut for Greek bondholders, letting the Bush tax cuts for the rich expire, or some kind of Tobin tax on financial transactions - all great ideas but are just bribes to keep the game the same, the slow bleeding of the patient for the benefit of the wizard. We've gotta go big or go home - if we want to get home like Dorothy that is.
"Still, if you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed; if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Churchill, Winston; The Second World War, Volume I: The Gathering Storm
Posts
